Troubleshooting Microservices Setup with Docker: Lessons Learned

Naqeeb ali Shamsi
5 min readJul 3, 2023

--

Introduction

Setting up a microservices architecture with Docker can bring many benefits, but it can also introduce certain challenges. In this article, I’ll share my experience and the pitfalls I encountered while configuring multiple microservices using Docker. I’ll dive into the issues I faced during the setup and explain how I identified and resolved them.

Challenges in Setting Up Docker and Microservices

When working with Docker and setting up multiple microservices, several challenges may arise. These can include container networking, data sharing, and coordinating services. I encountered similar challenges during my project, which required careful analysis and troubleshooting to find the best solutions.

Project

ª   .env
ª docker-compose.yaml
ª tree.txt
ª
+---services
ª ª .env
ª ª firebase.js
ª ª
ª +---login
ª ª Dockerfile
ª ª Dockerfile.test
ª ª login.js
ª ª package.json
ª ª
ª +---registration
ª ª Dockerfile
ª ª Dockerfile.test
ª ª package.json
ª ª registration.js
ª ª
ª +---session
ª Dockerfile
ª Dockerfile.test
ª package.json
ª session.js
ª
+---tests
login.test.js
registration.test.js
session.test.js

Pitfalls

Setting up microservices with Docker can be complex, and there are several pitfalls to be aware of during the process. By understanding these pitfalls, you can navigate potential challenges more effectively. Here are some common pitfalls to watch out for:

1. Improper Networking Configuration

One common pitfall involves improperly configuring the networking between microservices within Docker. It’s essential to ensure that each microservice has a unique network identifier, such as a hostname or IP address, to allow seamless communication. Neglecting proper networking configuration can lead to connection failures and unexpected behavior.

2. Data Sharing and Persistence

When dealing with data in microservices architecture, it’s crucial to define a strategy for sharing and persisting data. Avoid the temptation to tightly couple microservices by sharing databases or file systems between them. Instead, opt for decoupled data management approaches, such as utilizing APIs or event-driven architectures, to maintain loose coupling and promote scalability.

3. Incorrect Dependency Management

Managing dependencies in a microservices environment can be challenging, especially when using different programming languages or frameworks. Ensure that each microservice has its own separate dependencies defined accurately. Avoid relying on global dependencies or mixing incompatible versions, as this can lead to conflicts and runtime errors.

4. Lack of Service Monitoring and Observability

Failing to implement proper monitoring and observability can hinder the identification and resolution of issues in a microservices setup. It’s crucial to have comprehensive logging, monitoring, and distributed tracing mechanisms in place. Embrace tools like Prometheus, Grafana, or ELK stack to gain insights into the runtime behavior, performance, and potential bottlenecks of individual microservices.

5. Neglecting Container Size and Performance Optimization

Containers should be lean and optimized to ensure efficient resource utilization. Neglecting container size and performance optimization can lead to increased resource consumption, slower deployments, and higher costs. Pay attention to optimizing images, reducing unnecessary dependencies, and ensuring proper container resource limits to achieve optimal performance and scalability.

6. Insufficient Testing and Continuous Integration

Microservices architecture often involves intricate interactions between multiple services. Failing to implement comprehensive testing, including unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end tests, can lead to unanticipated issues in production. Establish a strong continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) pipeline to automate testing and guarantee a smooth release process.

7. Scaling and Orchestrating Microservices

Scaling microservices is essential for handling increased loads and ensuring high availability. However, scaling individual microservices independently can be complex. Consider employing container orchestration tools like Kubernetes or Docker Swarm to simplify the scaling process, automate service discovery, and manage the lifecycle of your microservices effectively.

Embarking on my journey through the clouds, I began by focusing on the fundamentals. During this project, I encountered a perplexing issue when executing the docker-compose up --build command, which consistently failed with a ‘File Not Found’ error. Despite investing hours in troubleshooting, I couldn’t pinpoint the root cause. My Dockerfiles were accurate, the code executed flawlessly on my local environment, and individual docker builds ran smoothly. Utterly frustrated, I turned to the internet for guidance, as my attempts at resolving the problem independently proved futile.

After conducting a targeted search and refining my keywords, I finally uncovered the problem: an incorrect build context. In essence, the build context refers to the path containing all the necessary resources for constructing Docker image(s). In my case, I attempted to utilize files within my code that were absent from the directory where my Dockerfiles resided, as depicted in the accompanying ‘‘directory tree’’. Furthermore, I was mistakenly executing the docker-compose up --build command from the root directory where my yaml lies. Fortunately, I was able to fix the context in the docker-compose.yaml which file resolved my predicament:

version: '3'
services:
registration:
build:
context: .
dockerfile: ./services/registration/Dockerfile
ports:
- 8080:8080
login:
build:
context: .
dockerfile: ./services/login/Dockerfile
ports:
- 8081:8080
session:
build:
context: .
dockerfile: ./services/session/Dockerfile
ports:
- 8082:8080

Nuances and Lessons Learned

Throughout the setup, build, and run process, we encountered a few additional nuances that are worth highlighting:
- File and Dependency Sharing: Ensuring that the necessary files and dependencies were accessible by the microservices within the Docker containers was crucial. Double-checking file paths and including all required dependencies in the Docker build process helped avoid “Cannot find module” errors.
- Proper Networking and Ports: Verifying the networking configuration ensured that microservices could communicate effectively. Mapping the correct ports between the host machine and the Docker containers allowed seamless interaction with the services.
- Build and Run Optimization: As the project grew, we optimized the build and run process to minimize unnecessary re-builds. Leveraging Docker layer caching and adopting incremental build techniques significantly reduced build times during development and testing iterations.

--

--

Naqeeb ali Shamsi
Naqeeb ali Shamsi

Written by Naqeeb ali Shamsi

Software Engineer | Full-Stack | AWS | Python| DevOps

No responses yet